| Subject: |
|
| |
I'm very impressed with the Web version of
the product, and with the documentation. I've not used the
Unix client version so don't know if the functionality and
interface is richer.
It implements something I've been
describing for a long time, in a semistructured (halfway
between a database and a document) environment, which is key
to building and maintaining dynamic knowledge bases to support
situational context awareness (i.e., any executive, manager,
and worker's dream). Lotus Notes and some of the newer XML
applications (and my own Context Management and General
Enterprise Management designs/prototypes) are the only other
products that work in this space, while LDAP provides an
interface between semistructured and structured data. You can
build a deep "tree" of categorized topics (hierarchical
logbooks), you can build a "star" of associations between
entries (cross-post logbook entries, and you can track change
(e.g., "arrow" of time) (versioning). This ability to support
tree/star/arrow data structures is at the heart of object
management.
Roebuck Object Model
The underlying technology
is apparently some form of programmed database (perhaps a text
DB) on Unix. Critical points for this product are: how is the
data stored; how is it maintained, is it scalable to
enterprise or global levels, and is Logbook's metadata and
data accessible via other technologies like XML, ODBC, LDAP,
and SQL. If such interfaces are available, it's a definite
"keeper". If not interfaceable, then it has utility, but only
as an isolated branch of the functionality being sought by
your clients. I'd personally like to see this implemented in
our clients' organizations. It would save them a fortune and
lots of manyears by avoidance of reinventing the wheel, and by
providing a means to optimally inform everyone involved
(situational context awareness).
Logbook performs
functions, as described above, I've not yet seen in the
commercial market. It imposes a structure/order and discipline
that all but the military, legal, project control, database
management, or knowledge management communities might find
onerous. People, outside of these and other informational
disciplines striving for consistency and maintainability,
would seek to break out of Logbook's structure/rigor and add
costly/complex variances to the design and content. That's why
the dynamism of the object model, which Logbook seems to
implement, is important.
The documented collaboration
requirements you've shown me may drive added functionality
into Logbook (supported by integration with whole applications
or just licensed/developed modules), or drive Logbook into
interoperability (using the interfaces described above) with
other Applications such as Netscape Collabra (NNTP), Lotus
Domino, MS Exchange, Sun Forum, and other collaboration
environments. I'd personally like to see the Logbook
application put into the commercial domain either as
opensource or costed.
The key is to usability of
Logbook is: 1) open metaschema (design principles), metadata
(design), and data (interchange) as in UMI (Unified Modeling
Interface = XML + LDAP + DMTF/CIM); and 2) interface to LDAP
V3 servers as source of user accounts and groups (instead of
redundant-labor and costly separate user/group administration
in current Logbook).
A potential Web Logbook weakness:
I'm unsure as to whether Attributes can be added by Web users,
which I consider essential for a tool such as Logbook to be
able to adapt to the dynamism the users encounter in their
activities. Constraining their ability to categorize (e.g.,add
attributes and organize hierarchically) and to associate
(e.g., cross-post to other categories/logbooks) is like
putting constraints on their thinking and perceptions.
The ability to tag a particular element of an existing
post, and then refer to that tag via a link from another post
would also be extremely valuable as a means to refine the
user's and group's knowledge (e.g., via XLL -
XPath/XLink/XPointer).
The techniques for inserting
URL, Images, and HTML formatting tags in Logbook is awkward.
The Logbook developers might consider using a technique
similar to the Ultimate Bulletin Board's UBB Code
(http://ultimatebb.com and
http://www.scriptkeeper.com/ubb/ubbcode.html), or consider
licensing the UBB codes for Logbook
use.
roy(AT)one-world-is.org | |
| |